Puri et al. (via Zamakhshary 2008) · ~30% · Infants in whom incarceration had already occurred (1984 series) · 1984
Olesen et al. (SR) · 1% · All children in awaiting-surgery cohorts (incarceration itself ~7–12% of them) · 2019
Ein et al. · 0.3% · Children after elective repair · 2006
Why they differ
The denominators are radically different: conditional on incarceration occurring (30% historically) ≠ inclusive of all waiters (1%) ≠ after a quiet planned repair (0.3%). There is no arithmetical conflict between them; the conflict is born only when any one of them is stripped of its denominator.
Adopted
The three are always published together with their denominators written, and in the parents' card they are presented in qualitative wording ('incarceration may harm the testicle — and speed and the planned operation are the protection') without headlining the 30%.
Justification
Deleting any layer misleads; the historical figure is kept because no newer pooled estimate exists for this specific conditional denominator — with it tagged '1984' wherever it appears (sources >10 years rule: the reasoning is written here).